Animal testing began in the time of the ancient Greeks in the 3rd or 4th century BCE. Animal Testing Pros has been a way for doctors to perfect their surgical strategies and test cures for ailments and diseases without accosting human lives in the process. I do accept that it is cruel to risk the lives of innocent animals that neither had nor wanted anything to do with medicine. However, consider the following benefits of animal testing:
Animal Testing Pros Can Be Controlled
Let’s face it, we’re not honest all the time. We aren’t even honest with ourselves sometimes. So how are doctors and physicians expected to trust us when they tell us that they want to test an experimental drug on us that may or may not kill us? Not to mention the fears and apprehensions that we would develop by just thinking about “experimental testing.” The truth is that there are too many variables that we simply cannot control within humans that we can in animals. Have you ever wondered how Dr. Jonas Salk developed the cure for polio? He tested his formulas on lab animals where he controlled all the variables and was able to monitor everything. One of the biggest Animal Testing Pros is that you have absolute and ultimate control over all the variables. You can make much more significant progress in development using this method than by using humans for testing.
It Is Easier to Get a Sample Space for Animal Testing
If you wouldn’t think about signing up for experimental testing. Imagine how doctors are going to get 20, 30, or even 500 people to sign up for such testing. another one of the major Animal Testing Pros is that it is much easier and inexpensive to get 100 lab rats as compared to getting 100 humans for experimental testing. Furthermore, animals don’t have commitment issues like humans and won’t leave in the middle of testing. Humans might just decide that they aren’t comfortable with the testing and may leave midway. Let’s not forget that it would take a significant amount of money to convince any of us to even consider signing up for experimental testing. It would eat away at the budget for research and development.
Would You Rather A Mouse Died or A Human?
The sad reality of testing is that there is a good chance the test subject will not survive the testing in a lot of cases. Would you be OK with your friends dying because of the experimental testing that they signed up for? Or worse, your loved one? Where we don’t want animals to die for the sake of testing, we also don’t want to die ourselves. It may be cruel to say, but one of the animal testing pros is that the mental disturbance of human fatality is removed from the equation and the research can continue at a constant speed. A cure is found faster this way.
What are the pros of animal testing?
Millions of lives have been benefited and saved because of the use of animals in testing. Research on treating and preventing many illnesses, including high blood pressure, diabetes, TB, poliomyelitis, muscular dystrophy, and Parkinson’s disease, has benefited from the use of animals.
Why should we stop animal testing?
Because of false results from animal experiments, humans suffer. Animal experiments may yield inaccurate data that lead to clinical trials of physiologically flawed or even deadly medicines, putting patients at undue risk and squandering limited scientific resources.
Is it still inhumane to test on animals?
Not only is the detrimental use of animals in research horrible, but it is also frequently unsuccessful. Many illnesses that affect humans, including effective forms of heart disease, numerous cancers, HIV, Parkinson’s disease, and schizophrenia, do not generally affect animals.
Who started animal testing?
Ibn Zuhr, an Arab physician practicing in Moorish Spain in the 12th century, started using animals in experiments to test surgical techniques before using them on human patients.
Who pays for animal testing?
The public, intentionally or unwittingly, funds animal testing through taxes, charity contributions, lottery tickets, and purchases of goods. One of the primary sources of funding is from publicly funded government awarding organizations such as the NIH.
In animal experimentation, are animals tortured?
In truth, laboratories mistreat animals. To evaluate the safety of cosmetics, detergents, cleaning products, and medications, thousands of captive dogs, cats, mice, guinea pigs, rabbits, and primates are forced to consume chemicals by feeding, injection, application, or other means.
What percentage of animals die during testing?
In U.S. laboratories, about 110 million animals—including mice, rats, frogs, dogs, cats, rabbits, hamsters, guinea pigs, monkeys, fish, and birds—are slaughtered every year for biology classes, medical training, curious experimentation, and chemical, drug, food, and cosmetics research.
Though these points may not be the most agreeable. They should be sufficient enough to prove that animal testing pros are indeed significant. It is the only way for mankind to move further and evolve in the world of medicine, for now anyway.